Crowe wrote:
This is why I feel some of the questions I see on this forum (R&R) are really futile
Really? We have the grammar police, the "the topic is too vague" police, criticisms because people don't do a search before they ask a question, someone who not only thinks he can define what a "bad" road is for everyone but believes asking a question about a road is a waste of time and those that tell us if we buy a dog other than a rescue we are evil. WHAT ARE ALL OF YOU ON HERE FOR THEN? It's a place to ask questions, get information, share stories and interests, and to make friends, not constantly criticize and whine. Is cabin fever setting and making everyone cranky? Lighten up people. If you don't want to answer a question or the title of the post is too vague for your liking, save yourself the stress and don't respond/don't click. It's that easy.
I don't know how you could read my post and watch the video and so completely miss the entire point of both. It seems clear to me that you didnt read my post carefully and did not watch the video.
No one is mentioning rules or police here. I never said that it was not a place to ask questions. Nor do I have Cabin fever. And I certainly am NOT defining what a bad road is or should be to anyone. What I was doing was showing what I consider to be a challenging road and to put my advice to others in context of how I veiw some roads others would say never to take.
The premise is simply this: a questioner must have some kind of idea about what the person that answers feels is a challenging road or condition to have any idea how valuable that particular advice is to them. Without that the answer is really useless.
All I am saying is that it would be HELPFUL to everyone if people would just give an idea of what they think of certain roads or conditions in their questions or answers. This way the questioner can put the answers they receive in some meaningful context.
Now please tell me what riled you up so much about that idea?
