Forum Discussion
- wapiticountryExplorer
bgum wrote:
If you believe the vaccine results the only people at risk would be other unvaccinated people . With vaccines being widely available the vulnerable made the choice to be that way. I see no reason or obligation on my part to do anything to protect them.
It should be required to travel across borders or on public transportation. No one has the right to endanger the health of others. There will be those who don't get shot because of religion and that is their choice but should not be permitted to travel. Those who can't take the shot due to health also should not travel due to health.
It is all a matter of choice. And it is a personal choice. - agesilausExplorer III
PackerBacker wrote:
Please keep the discussion relative to crossing the border for RVing or camping!
Moderators
Right back to the subject: Their country, their rules. Don't like it, stay home. I was interested to see that this month's Escapade has three "Going to Alaska' seminars planned. - Community AlumniPlease keep the discussion relative to crossing the border for RVing or camping!
Moderators - JaxDadExplorer III
Terryallan wrote:
time2roll wrote:
Terryallan wrote:
It is. Best of luck to them without the vaccine.
Honestly. Shouldn't it be a personal choice?
Agree to a point. But since they lived thru the worst part, and didn't get it. There is a better than good chance they won't and in truth it is 99 percent survivable for most people.
Then there is the ones that did have it and now have immunity because of it. They don't need the vaccine. Or so the doctors say.
Some of the variants are making the original virus look like hay-fever.
It is hop-scotching over double vaccinated folks and previously infected (and recovered) folks like it’s a completely different bug. - agesilausExplorer III
Terryallan wrote:
Honestly. Shouldn't it be a personal choice? We have had ours. But we weren't forced. Isn't that what freedom is all about. After all, if you are vaccinated, you are safe. Well if it works. So by trying to force others to be vaccinated. Aren't you really saying you don't trust your vaccination?
And if you don't think your vaccination worked, why would you think someone else's did? Them being vaccinated makes you no safer. So why worry about their choice?
I'm not for forcing folks to be vaccinated, especially since herd immunity seems to have been achieved. On the other hand I agree with the policy of no vaccination no school, or if employers demands the jab then no jab no job.
As Eisenhower may have said, the public (he said army) is like a mass of cooked spaghetti, you can't get behind and push you have to get in front an pull. Door to door gestapo inspections aren't pulling.
The idea that your neighbor needs to get the jab to protect you is wrong, if you are worried get the jab yourself and be protected. It doesn't matter what others do. The same hogwash was h tried over forcing people to wear masks. - TerryallanExplorer II
bgum wrote:
It should be required to travel across borders or on public transportation. No one has the right to endanger the health of others. There will be those who don't get shot because of religion and that is their choice but should not be permitted to travel. Those who can't take the shot due to health also should not travel due to health.
It is all a matter of choice. And it is a personal choice.
So you are saying your vaccination didn't work? That the covid shot is useless? Because if you have had it, and it works. It doesn't matter if someone beside of you has had it or not. IF it works. You are protected. How are they endangering your health?
That you don't believe it works is the very reason most are not getting it. Why get it, if it doesn't work? - pennysmom09Explorer
bgum wrote:
It should be required to travel across borders or on public transportation. No one has the right to endanger the health of others. There will be those who don't get shot because of religion and that is their choice but should not be permitted to travel. Those who can't take the shot due to health also should not travel due to health.
It is all a matter of choice. And it is a personal choice.
It’s not a “personal choice” if you say if you don’t take the shot you cannot go anywhere. - LwiddisExplorer IIX2, bgum.
- bgumExplorerIt should be required to travel across borders or on public transportation. No one has the right to endanger the health of others. There will be those who don't get shot because of religion and that is their choice but should not be permitted to travel. Those who can't take the shot due to health also should not travel due to health.
It is all a matter of choice. And it is a personal choice. - TerryallanExplorer II
pennysmom09 wrote:
I am fully vaccinated, my personal choice. However, there have been no long time tests to prove it is safe, so I wouldn’t criticize anyone who is Leary of it. Just because millions have agreed to it and a small percentage have bad reactions, no one knows what the long time effect will be. There is usually a 3:to 5 year trial period to vaccines, this one only has months. So I understand why many people aren’t willing to chance it. Just because our governments have taken a gestapo like approach to it doesn’t mean it is safe.
Exactly
About Bucket List Trips
13,487 PostsLatest Activity: Jan 18, 2025