jtcpartners wrote:
Dan, do you mean you are agreeing with wgriswolds comments about route? What do you folks think about jmtandem saying “Take 49 to 88 to 89, shorter and very doable in an RV”. Which do you all think is the best route for me to take. A little shorter or longer doesn't matter so much. I rather go the route best for the rig. If they are equally passable then how about which is most scenic? Thanks!
The 88/89 route is more scenic and perhaps shorter. I have traveled both but have never measured the distance. With my trailer I prefer the Hwy 50 route because my Suburban struggles with steep mountain passes. My entirely subjunctive opinion is that there are more uphill climbs with the 88/89 route. I could do it but there would be more time in first gear at 30 mph. I often go that way when coming home from Jackson without the trailer.
With any threat of snow one should always go with Hwy 50.
