Gingerela wrote:
Your review has been deferred because your comments focus on a singular bad incident or incidents that may or may not happen to other people who stay at this park. We are sorry this happened to you, and we appreciate the fact that you want to inform others. However, please understand that describing personal incidents such as these is not a review for the park. We would be happy to post your review if, rather than talking about your unfortunate experience(s), you would focus on describing the condition and quality of the facilities, the services, and the amenities provided at the park. What was its general appearance? Were the roads easy to navigate? What did the sites look like? Were they paved or gravel? Were they large enough and level? Did the utilities work well, and were they conveniently placed? Were there any amenities? Please assist us in approving and posting your rev iew by resubmitting it with this objective in mind. Thank you.
What a croc! Suppressing candid feedback of actual experiences vs generalities of a checkbox kind of style IMHO a real disservice to those who are expecting to get a valid review of the CG.
It's a shame to see a once good resource be co-opted by advertising money, greed, or lack of interest in their customers.
