Military Campgrounds

zb39 wrote:
So if your "just" a veteran, you can forget about getting in.

Pretty much so. I will say this, the access rules apply to current MWR facilities. Just because a campground/famcamp was once part of a military's facility doesn't mean it's still under MWR. As some facilities construct MWR campgrounds on base, they may be relinquishing control over remotes campsites. When that happens, they revert to federal campgrounds open to all or they are sold or leased to private campground operators.

Nam, my family and I stayed at those inns in Germany in early 1990s (WWII era built); very nicely maintained, but not part of MWR facilities. Because we were not retired reservists then, we had to wait until the end of the day to determine if there were openings for us as we were not in Germany with a set of military orders; we were there as tourists. It was worth the wait while we toured Burtisgaden (spelling problem!).

I have noticed recently the RV family camp at Travis AFB is always almost full whereas the tent only sites are always mostly empty. Just saying. I always stay at the modern base AF Inn. Very nice, convenient to SF and affordable.

So if your "just" a veteran, you can forget about getting in.

garmp wrote:
To my understanding they are for active, retired or 100% disabled.

Not entirely correct. It's ANY veteran with a VHIC that shows "Purple Heart" or "Service Connected". So a veteran with a rated service connected disability (need not be 100% anymore) are eligible to use MWR facilities.

To my understanding they are for active, retired or 100% disabled. As in any other network things can change from one place to another, but that is generally the rule. Check with the FamCamp you are interested in.This might help link

It seems our socio-economic methodology today has become 'milk the cash-cow' for as much money as possible. And those that earned certain benefits find those benefits shrinking or disappearing in order to feed that methodology.

Earned military benefits - medical and recreation in particular - have been a target of that methodology for years.

charlestonsouthern wrote:
Now, why would an active duty military family want to stay in a campground on base for six months?

They make money by getting a housing allowance and then only having to pay the monthly rate at the campground. That could amount to $1000+/mo in their pocket tax free. A friend who is a USAF doc is doing it. She bought a trailer, about a 32 ft. She said there's limited housing on her base so she gets housing allowance. Apartments around the base are either not fit to live in or well above her allowance pay. She bought the trailer and pockets over $1000/mo tax free. The installation cmdr allows it on her base. It's against the MWR policy but installation cmdrs have a lot of freedom what they can do.

There has also been a overall reduction in MWR RV campsites throughout the US.

As some facilities get handed over from military to civilian agency control, the MWR facility is also converted to a federal or private campground open to all. We are also seeing some facilities reduce RV sites by installing cottages. Those cottages can be used by everyone regardless of needing an RV. Plus they can often fit more cottages in the same space as a single RV site.

Now, why would an active duty military family want to stay in a campground on base for six months? I think it's because there is a shortage of base housing for that family when they checked into the campground. For example, bases in the state of California have personnel with their campers in military campgrounds, no base housing available for them at that time, and military families can't afford the rent in California outside of the base gates. Therefore, recreational campgrounds become temporary base housing, but no one on base wants to talk about that.