Forum Discussion
Lantley
Feb 17, 2018Nomad
Under the old system if the OP or guest has an issue and are unable to show up Sun Resorts is left with a vacancy, but more importantly lost revenue.
Under the new policy Sun Resorts is putting the health / vacancy risk on the guest. Why should Sun be left holding the bag or scrambling to find someone to to fill a vacancy if the reservation is cancelled.
There is really no issue as long as the site is occupied. If there is a huge risk factor involved the OP may want to stay somewhere else. Under the new policy the funds the OP is risking is his own vs. Sun Resorts assuming the risk.
Keep in mind you will never eliminate the risk of unforeseen vacancies. The question is who is going to assume/pay those risk. Being responsible for your own risk seems to be the better way.
Under the new policy Sun Resorts is putting the health / vacancy risk on the guest. Why should Sun be left holding the bag or scrambling to find someone to to fill a vacancy if the reservation is cancelled.
There is really no issue as long as the site is occupied. If there is a huge risk factor involved the OP may want to stay somewhere else. Under the new policy the funds the OP is risking is his own vs. Sun Resorts assuming the risk.
Keep in mind you will never eliminate the risk of unforeseen vacancies. The question is who is going to assume/pay those risk. Being responsible for your own risk seems to be the better way.
About Campground 101
Recommendations, reviews, and the inside scoop from fellow travelers.14,716 PostsLatest Activity: Oct 15, 2013