Forum Discussion
fickman
Oct 12, 2013Explorer
It's pretty easy for me:
- The Constitution says exactly what the Federal government is allowed to do
- It reserves everything not listed for the states and the people
- It never mentions national parks
I understand the pragmatic consideration for wanting the Feds to own it, but the philosophical case isn't there.
I don't want a political debate, though. It is sad that the residents of the states are essentially being double taxed for these parks to reopen. . . triple charged if they show up and pay fees to get in.
- The Constitution says exactly what the Federal government is allowed to do
- It reserves everything not listed for the states and the people
- It never mentions national parks
I understand the pragmatic consideration for wanting the Feds to own it, but the philosophical case isn't there.
I don't want a political debate, though. It is sad that the residents of the states are essentially being double taxed for these parks to reopen. . . triple charged if they show up and pay fees to get in.
About Campground 101
Recommendations, reviews, and the inside scoop from fellow travelers.14,716 PostsLatest Activity: Oct 15, 2013