Dog Folks wrote:
westernrvparkowner wrote:
Dog Folks wrote:
camper_ron wrote:
dieharder wrote:
I have seen plenty of reviews that discussed rude interactions between campground personnel and clients. I'm tempted to believe that there might be more to the story about the rejected reviews.
******
I tend to be very specific, so when I mentioned some individuals by name and was informed of my egregious error. I edited out said names re-submitted and it was posted.
r0n.....:B
I mean no disrespect to you.
By removing the names the offending person that person is now cloaked and unknown. That is what I mean about selective censorship with this site.
If naming names in a vulgar, or possibly libelous way, then remove it. If not, the truth, and just the facts, are an absolute defense against libel.
For this site to be believable , and have any value, these names need to be allowed.
Absolutely not. No names, ever. That would just be allowing people to slander others anonymously, since there is no mechanism to verify any of the comments made on any review site.
Good point-- with no resolution other than the poster make up some other excuse/problem that is outrageous, slanderous or simply not true. A poster can post anything that meets your concerns about anything, not just people. There is no mechanism to check these claims either.
The site COULD allow the campground owner to respond.
It is a site of opinions and we all know how some opinions have no basis in fact. I don't trust the site, I will not post there, but then again, that is my opinion.
They chose not to allow any responses. And even if responses were allowed, names would surely be verboten. If there was an incident, you could bet that the park would know the guest involved. What would stop the park from responding with untrue statements about that guest. Pretty simple to say "Yes there was a confrontation, but only after John Q. Public repeatedly violated park rules by allowing his dogs to defecate on other peoples' sites and when confronted Mr. Public responded with a string of profanities. It appeared Mr. Public was either drunk or high on drugs." While RVparkreviews.com is a relatively small and obscure website such a post would haunt Mr. Public whenever a Google or similar search was run. Names would cross a very big line.