Bumpyroad wrote:
this reminds me of years back, when the 1st KOA in Billings, MT, IIRC was being fussed at since the city fathers enacted a no overnight policy in various public lots, people were saying that the KOA was overpriced, not nice, etc. so I of course had to stay there and check it out on one trip West.
it was a very nice wooded location, quiet, etc. and I checked the price of that vs another one in town which ended up being more and was not nicer.
since then I take these "complainers" with a grain of salt.
If you are too cheap to stay in a decent RV park, go ahead and stay in the muddy rutted road cheap campgrounds.
bumpy
Sorry Bumpy but yours is a straw-man argument. It's not an either-or situation. Many times you will find a NICER park or one as nice at cheaper rates.
And just what is a "decent" RV Park. Your statement assumes that any other choice except the expensive one is by definition not "decent". That is to my mind a totally false assumption.
This is an issue of VALUE. Perceived and real. And while each persons idea of Value may vary a bit it is based on one overriding notion: That you are getting a fair or better than fair return for your dollar.
And it is ONLY the customer that decides that.