NC Hauler wrote:
gafidler wrote:
Dish was a better deal for me than direct. If you are traveling less than 200 miles from home you get locals without doing anything over 200 miles you call and they change the locals for you. I use the same receiver at home and in the RV, I do use 2 different satellite dishes.
I've had both and prefer Direct TV, but again, guess it has to do with choice..I do almost all my camping in the mountains and Direct TV, at one time had to be aimed higher into the sky to get a signal, and this helped get over some mountains and trees; again, back when I had Dish, it aimed lower and could be a bear to get reception when in some mountainous areas.
As far as traveling less than 200 miles and getting locals, I live in Asheville NC and have camped in Pence Springs WV and still gotten all my locals and also to Myrtle Beach and still got my locals...only place I couldn't receive them was at the Outer Banks. I too use the same receiver(s) that I use at home. I was surprised when I could pick them up in WV, though Myrtle Beach was also a nice surprise.
I believe Direct TV offers a little more programming and more HD stations than Dish, (IF that means anything to anyone).
Not sure about the 200 mile range, I have gotten local channels as far away as Phoenix ,Az , 700 miles from home, finally lost the locals when we got to Tombstone area 850 miles from home. Never had Dish ,but have never had a reason to change . My reason for Direct at the time was that Dish did not offer the pro football package, which apparently they do now.
The one thing I do know is that my friend that I camp with in Montana every summer has a much more difficult time getting Dish reception then I do with Direct for whatever reasons. I point mine somewhat south easterly ,and I got a signal.