KZ Durango vs Keystone Laredo bunkhouses!!

I do know that KZ is not a top-of-the line unit and various sources noted to stay away from the KZ, due to cheaper construction materials. We have had a Keystone travel trailer and were very satisfied with it, but needed something bigger for longer vacations. We now have a Keystone Sprinter, not a top-of-the line unit, but we are satisfied with it. Time will tell how this 5ver will hold out.
Good luck!


Here is some websites to consider: http://mythreecents.com/reviews/kz-rv

http://www.rv.net/forum/index.cfm/fuseaction/thread/tid/24889446.cfm

http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/KZ-RV-LP/Shipshewana-Indiana-46565/KZ-RV-LP-Water-Water-EVERYWHERE-Shipshewana-Indiana-687651

We have our KZ Durango for almost 6 years and love it! Had a few problems that I didn't notice but the dealer did and replaced it. We would by another KZ in a heart beat. They were great in warrenty issues. I know different people own it ( Thor) and I hope the run it as it was before. I think quality was fine and I have out about 50k miles on it! I wouldn't be afraid of buying another one.
Good luck

Bruce

Oh c'mon Jandsa - you do a google search on Keystone and you get the same type of thing. Do you really got to go there?

Keystone Problems

More

More of the same

Have I made my point yet?

We have had our KZ for about 6 years now and also love it... The fit and finish is wonderful , any small problems that may have cropped up were addressed properly as soon as they happened...
I personally have never heard any REAL BAD complaints about the company like stated a few posts above me... Most folks , if not all folks that I have spoken to agree..
Now with that said,,, EVERY manufacturer puts out a lemon or 2 in their history and its how they deal with those that separates them.. either good or bad.. I would buy another in a heart beat !!

Point taken, wing_zealot...lemons in every lot.


It seems the KZ owners who posted are satisfied with their purchase and glad for them.

I do stand behind my premise of looking at construction materials and those that have been constructed with a wood frame in there somewhere, I would stay away from buying. There is one such model that was made a couple of years ago, but I didn't pay attention to the name.

Happy Camping!

Check them both out and go with the one that suits you best. We have the KZ 358Bhk and are happy with it. Have not had a Keystone product yet but would not hesitate to buy one if we liked it. Best of luck with your choice.

sorry, double post

big fan of our KZ......not sure what cheap materials jandsa is talking about but if you look at how KZ's are built you'll find that simply isn't the case. The fit and finish on ours is excellent. I would buy another KZ in a heart beat and will look at those before anything else if/when we need a new one.

We had a wood frame KZ for 8 years and never had a single problem with it.

From there we upgraded to a Keystone Outback. Very nice camper and we were pleased with it but it was stolen at 14 months old. It had a few water leaks but fortunately I caught them early.

For a replacement we compared the Keystone Cougar FW to the KZ FW we have now. We went with the KZ because we preferred the floor plan. Almost 2 years into it and the only repairs to date was a slide adjustment and slide seal recaulked.

We would have gone with either in regards to construction, materials, quality etc. They were very comparable. For us the floor plan was the deciding factor.

It should be noted that Keystone has a one year warranty whereas KZ is two years. My Durango still has 2 months left on the warranty. If I went with the Keystone the warranty would have expired 10 months ago.