rhagfo wrote:
N-Trouble wrote:
rhagfo wrote:
SanMarMor wrote:
I have the JT and they work great. It looks like the Steadyfast only goes on one front leg and one rear jack. If that's the case, that doesn't seem good to me. I would go with the JT or JT style by other manufacturers, and get full stabilization, not just one in front and one in back.
Mark
X2! BUT
The OP has already placed the order for Steadyfast system, I agree that the double bracing of the front legs and center bracing of the back make for a rock solid stance, and I don't have X chocks.
I guess some just dont care about others first hand testamonials on a product and just want to draw their own conclusions. I see a lot of that on this forum. Just because someone chooses a different product than you are doesnt make it inferior.
Well the OP seems to have asked a question, to which he had already made up his mind, as 15 minutes after his question, he placed his order for the Steadyfast system, so why ask the question?
I asked the question and continued to read posts from every forum I could bring up on the subject and got much of the info elsewhere - but I just wanted to see if anyone had a glaring issue with either of the products.
Frankly users of both products seemed to be very happy, I couldn't find any complaints that didn't have to do with user error on either products.
The way my unit is made up front, there is no front cross member to tie the JT's to so I would have had to make my own crossmember that would have stuck out past the bottom of the bodywork. That's what made my decision quickly.
