Landing Gear Stabilizer ** now with installation pictures

N-Trouble wrote:

rhagfo wrote:

SanMarMor wrote:
I have the JT and they work great. It looks like the Steadyfast only goes on one front leg and one rear jack. If that's the case, that doesn't seem good to me. I would go with the JT or JT style by other manufacturers, and get full stabilization, not just one in front and one in back.

Mark

X2! BUT

The OP has already placed the order for Steadyfast system, I agree that the double bracing of the front legs and center bracing of the back make for a rock solid stance, and I don't have X chocks.

I guess some just dont care about others first hand testamonials on a product and just want to draw their own conclusions. I see a lot of that on this forum. Just because someone chooses a different product than you are doesnt make it inferior.

Well the OP seems to have asked a question, to which he had already made up his mind, as 15 minutes after his question, he placed his order for the Steadyfast system, so why ask the question?

rhagfo wrote:

SanMarMor wrote:
I have the JT and they work great. It looks like the Steadyfast only goes on one front leg and one rear jack. If that's the case, that doesn't seem good to me. I would go with the JT or JT style by other manufacturers, and get full stabilization, not just one in front and one in back.

Mark

X2! BUT

The OP has already placed the order for Steadyfast system, I agree that the double bracing of the front legs and center bracing of the back make for a rock solid stance, and I don't have X chocks.

I guess some just dont care about others first hand testamonials on a product and just want to draw their own conclusions. I see a lot of that on this forum. Just because someone chooses a different product than you are doesnt make it inferior.

Steadyfast has our vote.

SanMarMor wrote:
I have the JT and they work great. It looks like the Steadyfast only goes on one front leg and one rear jack. If that's the case, that doesn't seem good to me. I would go with the JT or JT style by other manufacturers, and get full stabilization, not just one in front and one in back.

Mark

X2! BUT

The OP has already placed the order for Steadyfast system, I agree that the double bracing of the front legs and center bracing of the back make for a rock solid stance, and I don't have X chocks.

I have the JT and they work great. It looks like the Steadyfast only goes on one front leg and one rear jack. If that's the case, that doesn't seem good to me. I would go with the JT or JT style by other manufacturers, and get full stabilization, not just one in front and one in back.

Mark

We used the steadyfast on our 1st 5er and we were happy with the difference, this time the 5er is longer and has more rock and roll then we remember the first one having so have decided to try the strong arm with more cross bars. Even if it slows it down we will be happy. We tried the wheel x tire stops and found not enough of a difference

BB_TX wrote:
I can only say that the JTs work great. No experience with the Steadyfast.

Same for me. JTs work great, but no experience with Steadyfast.

I can only say that the JTs work great. No experience with the Steadyfast.

The brand that I bought has two in an "X" between the front landing gear, they work great but if I was to get another 5th wheel I think I would go with the four bars.

I have had the Steadyfast on my 5er for the last year and been happy with it. Night/day difference in movement. I dont even bother with any other stabilizers as the Steadyfast is more than sufficient.