cpaulsen wrote:
azdryheat wrote:
This is why the government shouldn't be in charge of the parks. Keep in mind that the government doesn't have to buy any new land for a park because the government already owns most all of the land anyway, at least out west. A private builder could easily develop any size park we want and equip it any way we want and not have cost overruns, etc. The same private builder could easily upgrade any of the existing parks to accommodate today's RV's. Just look at all of the private rv parks and resorts already in existence.
What the rangers are saying is a bunch of bull. They don't want to develop new parks or rejuvenate older parks. Too much work for them and they didn't take on the ranger job to do any work.
Maybe you should contact the park system and maybe volunteer if you think the rangers do not want to work.
does dry heat affect ones thinking?
bumpy
