westernrvparkowner wrote:
Like it or not, experience has taught us that long term stays are not compatible with how we want to operate our parks.
Instead of "not compatible" maybe "not economical".
From my experience at working at an RV campground, long-term residents tend to contribute less to a park's bottom line than one-nighters or short timers . . . short timers pay more per day -- in some cases, much more -- than long timers.
However, long timers are typically guaranteed income. Unless you're running a very popular campground, you can't count on every one of your sites being occupied every day. The park I worked at set aside a fixed number of sites for long-term residents.