Forum Discussion
bigdogger
Mar 24, 2014Explorer II
rockhillmanor wrote:Your profile says you have been "on the Road" and a member for 10+ years. You haven't stayed in three RV parks during that time? The rule is in place to prevent lazy people from either posting a spectacular review for a park they have a financial interest in or a ranting, negative review of some parked that Peed them off. The purpose of RVparkreviews.com is to provide a resource for people looking for places to stay, not to be a sounding board to bash a park for some perceived transgression.
Be prepared for your comments to NOT be posted until you report on another 2 CG's. THE most ridiculous requirement RVparkreviews has.
AND why the bad comments are never seen. Leaving the rest of us to fall into the same nasty CG.
I am not a reporter for that site I don't write a review for each and every CG I stay at. IMHO the BAD reviews that prompt campers to fore warn others and leave them wanting to post it for others should be allowed without having to write several more reviews for it to get posted.
My most horrific CG I stayed at review.....is still siting in their hold file until I write 2 more reviews.
About Customer Support
Our Customer Service team is available to assist you any time between 6am-10pm MST. Ask a question about your account, recent order, and more.2,662 PostsLatest Activity: Nov 14, 2023