Who reviews Good Sam rated campgrounds
We are on our way to Alaska and are trying to stay at Good Sam campgrounds. The one we are at here in Everett, Washington is one of the worst campgrounds we have ever stayed at. Are they reviewed ...
Forum Discussion
bigdogger wrote:2gypsies wrote:It seems to me they use the system they do precisely to avoid the conflicts you mention. Pretty hard to give a park a point if it doesn't have the requisite amenity. A subjective scoring, where condition and other judgmental attributes were an issue would lead to a situation where relationships could greatly influence scores. I am curious what you would have them add or remove from the scoring system if you were in charge?
For many years I've tried to contact Good Sam to notify them of obvious flaws in their rating of certain campgrounds. I've never received a reply from Good Sam and in future years the rating has stayed the same. Sometimes I think the reviewers become buddies with the campgrounds over the years. I hold more faith in multiple various reviewers of RVParksReviews. However, for both of them, I know they're not 100%. It's just a general idea. I don't even try to contact Good Sam anymore. I do post reviews on RVParkReviews. Good luck!
The last RV park I tried to notify Good Sam about was Klamath, CA Camper Corral. It has a 8.5/10*/10 rating. The bathrooms were covered with those little shower plastic squares, including the toilet areas. They were full of toilet paper, hair and mud (I hope it was mud) They were not cleaned in the 3 days we were there. The laundry was equally dirty, including inside the washers. Trash cans were overflowing with fish guts. Worker's dog were tied up outside and barking. It was one of the most awful parks we've been. Public campgrounds are better.
