Forum Discussion

jjson775's avatar
jjson775
Explorer
May 09, 2017

Class A vs. B 4.0 - Campgrounds and Campsites

With a small RV, you can camp in many great places that big ones can’t - either because they can’t get there or the sites are too small. This is a big plus for traveling in a Class B or similar. Many of our best experiences have been in places like this, often without hookups, where RV’s over 24 ft. are not recommended. Examples are the Chisos Basin at Big Bend NP and the campground at El Morro National Monument.

Unfortunately, most commercial RV Parks are dumps. There are exceptions, such as Goulding’s in Monument Valley and Fort Wilderness at Disney World in FL (excellent!). There are some very nice RV resorts in FL and along the Gulf Coast for snowbirds and we stayed in one, Bentsen Rio Grande Valley in Mission TX, out of season. However, most commercial “parks” are really just big RV parking lots with the flavor of a trailer park.

Our preference is to stay in state parks or national parks and monuments in a real campground. We see big rigs in these places sometimes, but more commonly they seem to ride the major highways and interstates and stay in a KOA or something like it. Part of our RVing routine is a walk after dinner around the campground and on the trails nearby. We have enjoyed the wildlife on these evening walks and have seen deer, elk, bear, javelina, alligators, and other birds and animals. This is not the scene at a KOA. Who wants to walk around a bunch of RV’s?

In some places, we have been allowed to camp in the tent area because we have just the one small vehicle and don’t tow anything. We did this in Sequoia NP, Rocky Mountain NP, Disney World and this year at Colorado Bend SP in Texas. The tent areas are nicer than the RV parking area. At Disney World we camped in the tent/van campground. I had to go over to the RV area to empty our waste tanks and I could see that our campsite was better.

The long and short of all this, in my observation and experience, is that smaller RV’s tend to stay in more attractive places.
  • Lantley wrote:
    I disagree with the premise that most commercial parks are dumps.
    Of course there are dumps, but there are many decent to fantastic private parks in my area. By no means are all of them dumps. We also have many nice state parks in my area as well.
    Painting all private parks with a broad brush is very misleading
    Reading the hatred to everything but "doing it their way" bantered about by the Class B freaks posting to this thread, it would be a self fulfilling prophecy that a park that allows these posters to stay would have to be a dump. I know if every class B I have had stay at my parks took the position these first posters have taken, I would ban them without a second thought. Thankfully, most owners of Class B's are like all the other RV owners, great people. It is sad that some people have to denigrate everyone else so they feel empowered and important.
  • I disagree with the premise that most commercial parks are dumps.
    Of course there are dumps, but there are many decent to fantastic private parks in my area. By no means are all of them dumps. We also have many nice state parks in my area as well.
    Painting all private parks with a broad brush is very misleading
  • Hi Folks,
    What I have seen is that the people who have Class As have a different attitude toward RVing than the Class Bers. Most go from RV park to RV park. Most cannot even get in to their bathrooms or use their beds without extending their slides. US BS are more interested in travelling and exploring. A B is much cheaper to drive, maintainable, and camp than an A. US Bers have less money so are more conscious of costs, especially fuel and parking.

    Heapie.
  • Many places ban Bs because if they allow them then they have to argue with folks in minivans, regular vans, etc. "Why can't I stay here? You let THAT van in!" "I have a stove, bed and Porta potty in my van - so what's the difference?". And on and on.

    Banning them all is easier.
  • I couldn't agree more with the OP. We avoid commercial campgrounds and only use them in transit from one great state park, national park, BLM, NF or Corp property to another. We don't use our rig to be crammed next to other units like little boxes in a row.

    The only reason we are currently not driving a B and have a small C is tank size. We are now able to boondock for more extended periods of time. We never use campground toilets. Period.

    I have never understood why a $150,000 Class B is banned from some campgrounds but a C or even an A that is valued at half of that amount is welcomed with open arms. The only word that comes to my mind is ignorance.

    I suspect we will be returning to B World in a year or two because we will reach the place and age where we will tour more and camp less. And when we do, we will be buying a small B that retains a lot of van appearance and handling...like a Roadtrek 190. We want to visit and revisit this country and Canada while health allows us to go and enjoy and hike. Towing, which we sometimes do on some trips, is a pain in the fanny for me. Buying gas, parking etc. are compromised. Not so in a B.

    Paul
  • But don't forget that there are places that ban Class b RVs, only C and A allowed. DW has a brother that winters in such a place, and even though they have lots of open RV spaces for daily rental (the rest of the place in park models) we can't stay there and have to go someplace else.
  • jjson775 wrote:
    The long and short of all this, in my observation and experience, is that smaller RV’s tend to stay in more attractive places.
    Likewise the folks who can camp sans hookups.