Does this used C look like a decent deal

ron.dittmer wrote:

Artum Snowbird wrote:
It's small, compact and appeals to few. Why: no slide out, no walk around bed, no counter space. If you can live with that and know you can, it's a small market to resell those things.

I tend to disagree. There is a big market for fully functional shorter rigs.

As for the price, offer $40k and see what happens.

Now as for the quality, I have an issue with "Lack Of Quality", and have heard these units do lack it. I rank that issue high. I hate messing with the rig on every trip. I love focusing on the trip itself, not the rig itself. Thankfully our rig has been excellent.

BTW: Our rig has the same floor plan and no slideout as that rig and we love the floorplan. The ease of maneuverability is great because of the places we travel like national parks and such. We fit in nearly every campsite, both the high demand ones and secondary ones. Our primary focus is on how severe the slope is for leveling. Some NP campsites get ridiculous.

Agree with Ron on all counts. The floorplan is functional and works for the small size and space. I have a slide and wish I didn't. More weight and mechanicals to cause problems, weakens the whole coach with the big hole in the side of it.

I have a 23 ft something long Winnebago View and really would not want anything longer, though I would prefer the corner bed to the cab over bed I have now.

It is, however, not much savings over the other unit that was shown in one of the posts.

Charles