Good Idea or Bad Idea

bukhrn wrote:

wbwood wrote:

PatrickA51 wrote:

Jim Shoe wrote:
Here's a link to KOA Corporate. Frankly, I doubt that its company wide. They would be asking every potential camper nationwide to own a camera, have the ability to upload the pics to a computer and then send them to corporate HQ. At the very least, their website would crash in about 10 minutes from data overload. Even though I like KOAs, I wouldn't jump thru those hoops for that particular CG. I predict that they will soon lose their franchise.

Maybe they are trying to loose their Franchise.

I doubt that...3 of them are in the same group. Wilmington, New Bern and Smithfield. Great people at the Wilmington one. Haven't been to the other two.

The sad thing is that people come on here and post false or misleading information.

I can tell you what's NOT false, there are other places to camp than KOA, many of them as nice or better,anyplace that has the same restrictions, will also NOT be getting my money.

Strange that a person would only want to stay in a park that allows the seasonal sites to be anything goes, but I guess there are different strokes for different folks. As was previously posted, this rule only applies to people wanting to stay a month or more. If you read the bad reviews on RVparkreviews.com you will see that a large number of them cite the fact that the long term and seasonal sites look like refugee camps. But you go on thinking you are somehow being noble by saying you will boycott any business that tries to keep high standards. Just don't be two faced and then complain if you stay in some park where the rigs look like props for the remake of the Grapes of Wrath.