Am I correct on my thinking ? I would think with the correct alignment, rear Sumo's for ride plus the rear sway bar would be a good bang for the buck and should offer the E450 a decent ride and crosswind/bow wave control. RE caster : Due to the location of the rear compartments (rearward of the rear axle) does the weight of stuff carried in the rear compartments come into play in the shorter wheelbase models ? (158" WB models) When riding on the newer 2017/2018 E450's in a shorter 24-25 ft unit, that sits pretty much level all loaded up, what would the caster be set at ?

If you are looking to buy new why not look for one built on a Chevy Chassis you wont have any of those problems and don't have to spend a lot of money to get to handle correctly :B

I don't think the Sumos are going to be of any benefit unless the rear springs are overloaded. The rear of a short E-450 is pretty stiff and harsh. An upgrade to the front sway bar would probably more beneficial than upgrading the rear sway bar. Get as much caster as possible on the passenger side and maybe a quarter degree less on the driver side. You won't be able to get too much caster.

The 158" wheelbase on the E450 chassis implies a small Class C?If this is the situation you're interested in:We have a 24 foot Class C on a 158" E450. Since day-one, the only downside to it's handling or ride had been up/down pounding in the rear on highway cracks/potholes from it's too-stiff rear leaf springs (but I wanted the overkill E450 chassis for several reasons).It came stock with front and rear sway bars and a front steering shock. The sway bars and stiff springs - combined with it's wide rear dually stance - provides superb crosswind, highway curve, passing trucks, and roadside curbs/dips side-ways force stability. It "drives like a van", with one-hand steering being easy when safe to do so.I've since drastically reduced the up/down pounding in the rear by some time ago having a mechanic install Koni's automatically adjusting FSD (Frequency Selective Damping) shocks in just the rear. The front shocks and front steering shock are still the originals after 12 years and 70K+ miles.

bobndot wrote:.... that sits pretty much level all loaded up, what would the caster be set at ?My guess, if the caster is still the way it left the factory AND it is level fore and aft....best guess +4.0 to +4.5.That is based on 1 Degree nose down being +3.25 degrees.This is a krap shoot guessing game that comes with no guarantees.

I was always a GM guy in the 1500/2500 series but I figured I would give Ford a try in the 450 series but don't ask me why because I have no idea. :B I have experience with the 550 trucks and they are holding up very well (the diesel engines are a whole other story-emissions ) so I figured the 450 would work too, especially with the V10 pulling such a relatively light load. Tnx for the alignment info. much appreciated. I would think getting this right is solving most of the issues some people are having . pnichols wrote: Since day-one, the only downside to it's handling or ride had been up/down pounding in the rear on highway cracks/potholes from it's too-stiff rear leaf springs (but I wanted the overkill E450 chassis for several reasons).Driving a unit like yours , this is what I have noticed too. Maybe it's just the nature of the beast but I can live with that if I have to. That was my reason for thinking Sumo's might soften the pounding from hitting the bump stops ? Sumo's (AFAIK) will replace the OEM bump stops. If you guys think (in a vehicle like this) the shock upgrade would be a better alternative to the Sumo's, I will certainly look into that option because that too makes sense to me. I have gone that route with my TC's, Bilstein's and adjustable 9000's and it made a huge difference riding empty as well as more controlled rebound when loaded. They didn't have Sumo's when I owned the TC's only Timbrens but I opted for air bags then went to adding 2 leafs of real steel. Thank you all so far for your expertise and opinions.

Ride/handling upgrade - E450 / 158" wheelbase | Good Sam Community

Lumpty
Explorer
Jul 17, 2018
My light E450 (door sticker says 9900lbs empty) does indeed ride hard. Actually drives better with a heavy enclosed trailer hitched up. I have done some chassis add-ons like a Hellwig front sway bar, and originally Bilstien shocks all-around. I was not happy with the floaty low-speed valving of the digressive Bilsteins, and replaced the fronts with a pair of Monroe Magnum RV shocks, which were silly cheap and being a consistent firm shock way better. After 7 years the original steering stabilizer got swapped for a parts store Monroe unit too. I also just replaced the OEM Michelin LTX's with Coopers, not really wanting to pay the Bibendum tax. So far so good there too after 3500 miles. It generally drives pretty good for what it is.
pnichols
Explorer II
Jul 17, 2018
Rob, you might want to try a set of Koni FSD shocks in the rear, like I talked about earlier in this discussion.

They sure took a lot of the sting out of my E450 24 footer's pounding in the rear.
oldusedbear
Explorer
Jul 20, 2018
Have a 23 foot CoachHouse on an E450. Totally replaced rear leaf springs with Reyco Granning air suspension. Also added Koni FSD on all four corners. Pretty expensive but worth it to me.

Huge difference in ride.

Oldusedbear
pnichols
Explorer II
Jul 21, 2018
That non-slide Coach House Platinum 220 on the E450 chassis is a sweet rig.

Having one of those converted to 4X4, with slightly larger tires, and a small amount of lift would really make a comfortable way to camp in resorts or explore and camp off highway. The only downside I can see is that the 220's tanks are a bit small.

Forum Discussion

Ride/handling upgrade - E450 / 158" wheelbase

About Motorhome Group

Related Content

Wheelbase question

Wheelbase factors

Stated wheelbase

E450 wheelbase

Wheelbase ratio