You guys are arguing semantics. rgatijnet I understand what you mean, but you said it wrong. You said "The grand jury determined that he was negligent and should be punished." What Dutch is telling you is that isn't what happened. The grand jury determined that there was enough probable cause to hold the man to answer at trial. They did not determine he was negligent, and they did not determine he should be punished, those two determinations will be up to the trial jury if it goes that far. They only determined there is enough evidence to suggest he may be guilty of the charges, so now it's on to the next step in the process.
