Forum Discussion
DiskDoctr
Jun 07, 2018Explorer
How about a $15,000 fine for Fraudulent Theft of Service for forcing or attempting to force an establishment to provide accommodation for non-qualifying 'pets'
If a business wants to permit pets, that is their choice and can have its own rules and charges.
Once the fraudsters are at equitable risk as with businesses who may be unjustly sued, we start at a solution.
I would suggest adding a panel as the evaluating body before official certification and required in the event of a lawsuit- with the 3rd option of ruling 'no-fault' when no ill-intent by the defending party was intended and NO MONETARY AWARDS (including attys).
Stop the financial rewards for fraud and the fraud goes away ;)
If a business wants to permit pets, that is their choice and can have its own rules and charges.
Once the fraudsters are at equitable risk as with businesses who may be unjustly sued, we start at a solution.
I would suggest adding a panel as the evaluating body before official certification and required in the event of a lawsuit- with the 3rd option of ruling 'no-fault' when no ill-intent by the defending party was intended and NO MONETARY AWARDS (including attys).
Stop the financial rewards for fraud and the fraud goes away ;)
About Pet Owners
2,081 PostsLatest Activity: Dec 29, 2024