HappyKayakers wrote:
the owner said the dog would be allowed back in with a separate liability policy.
I get it now- my take is that the words "separate" liability policy muddy the waters a bit. Clearly, they're insisting that the dog be
specifically named as insured. I think getting some sort of rider on your existing liability policy/policies would do the trick. Seems to me this might be a fairly common request of insurers.
And since you have no specifics to relate as to what if anything your dog has "done", I'd think you could just tell the agent it's a requirement of the Park that the animal(s?) be specifically named and leave it at that.