yuma law re pets in RV
just tried to book a few days at the Palms in Yuma. replied we had 1 cat to the any pets question. was told to fax/bring proof of vaccinations to the park. After a bit of back and forth in which I ...
Forum Discussion
westernrvparkowner wrote:
Yet another example of how trying to pacify someone in regards to a rule doesn't work. Over the years I have found it is just as easy to use the two rules that always work. #1 - My park, my rules. #2 - Because I said so. Does it really matter if it is a city rule, a state rule, a federal rule or a park rule? If they want you to provide a rabies certificate you can either provide one or move on. But some people just want to object, so they seek justification. The park provided it by saying it was a city ordinance and that didn't suffice. There is nothing that is going to make them happy, because even if there was a city law, they would say it doesn't apply to them because it is a cat or it never leaves the RV or they are only transiting the area. People who are upset with a rule are going to be upset. That is really the first and last chapter of the book.
I disagree. I am not upset with the rule. I did move on.
like you said your park- your rules. I simply asked if anyone else staying in Yuma was subject to the alleged city ordinance.(which does not exist by the way) All of a sudden a bunch of arm chair shrinks come out of the woodwork. My rules #1 my money #2 my money. That, my friend, is the first and last chapter of this book.
