Forum Discussion

GordonThree's avatar
GordonThree
Explorer
Apr 22, 2015

An observation on WAZE app

This past weekend I visited family in the Washington DC area.

On Saturday morning, we decided to try to visit Virginia Beach, along with a few million other travelers.

Rolling along on I-95 at 5-10 miles per hour, Waze reported over 16,000 fellow wazers traveling the same road in a 1 mile radius. I had hoped waze would help me find an alternative route to my destination, but it offered no help in that regard. Instead, the app appeared to be aggravating congestion.

Every time the app shouted "WATCH OUT! blah blah blah" warning of a car on the shoulder or police ahead, hundreds of brake lights flickered in unison. I was shocked. The sheep drivers around me were all synchronized to their cell phones and panic breaking every time an app told them to. This panic braking created waves / ripple effect that slowed the entire traffic column down.

Not once did the app actually warn about anything dangerous - none of the cars on the shoulders were blocking traffic. They were just junkers that had overheated from driving at 10 miles an hour in 90 degree weather or people stopping for a break due and VDOT not giving them anywhere to pull off but on the narrow shoulder.

Overall, I'm not impressed by the app. The few other times I used it, it didn't offer any improved routing over that which my stand alone Garmin or Google Maps would offer, which are both connected to real-time traffic. Not sure why Google offers two navigation apps. I hope Google doesn't intend for Waze to take over from Maps, that would be terrible.
  • Hardly counter intuitive. You turn it on and it talks to you in plain english, seemed to work for you..
    I cannot think of any GPS, phone, app, TV, or even a microwave that doesnt need some configuring, so there must be an awful lot of 'nerds' around. In the case of WAZE, it fed by users. Thats how it works..
  • wa8yxm's avatar
    wa8yxm
    Explorer III
    What causes that problem... Depending on who you talk to the proper following distance is 2-4 car lengths for every 10MPH as I recall

    Or, if you are like most folks.. Count seconds 2-4 seconds

    If, as example, you see the vehicle in front of you go into the shadow of a bridge and you begin to count seconds One Thousand One... and you are in the shadow of that same bridge then

    1: You are about average
    2: YOU ARE TAILGATING the car ahead (following too close for safety)

    However if you get up to 2,3 or 4 without being in the shadow Yet.
    At one thousand two you are where I was originally taught
    At one thousand three you are were they teach today for cars
    At one thousand four you are where AEON teaches for RVs

    And all the above are for clear dry pavement.. Wet double or more the time/distance.

    But as I said,, ONE second is the average (Have watched thousands of drivers using both cameras and standing on the corner watching all the cars go by) OR LESS in many areas.

    So when someone slows a bit all the drivrs behind thm have to slam on the brakes or replace radiators and pay upgraded insurance premiums.

    Tailgating is the problem.. DO NOT ADD TO IT.
  • Let me see if I have this straight. Waze operates by using the input from all the people on the road, people that are supposed to be driving and paying attention to what they're doing. Why does this not sound like a good idea?

    Or am I incorrect about how Waze gets it information? I'm not a smartphone user so it certainly could happen.
  • Thats correct. Their servers monitor the speed of the phone against the posted speed on the road and draw graphics accordingly. Over time they have learned patterns in different areas and various users. When the system was in beta in LA it would often come up and say "we've noticed you have slowed down, is that because of traffic?" , and you answer if you can.

    WAZE also responds to voice commands as well, so there is little, if any fiddling with the screen at speed. I worry about people fiddling with email, facebook, and their GPS more than this. You can easily spend more time attempting to dial a phone number than dealing with WAZE
  • If it runs unattended then I have no problems with it, but any interaction required between it and the driver is a bad idea.

    In my experience most drivers have trouble enough with just trying to drive. :)
  • does waze pop up even if your not using the navigation? i just downloaded it.

    how bad of a battery killer is this?
  • Go look at the settings menus. WAZE is highly configurable! If you have it running on your screen, with a destination programmed or not, it'll use up battery life. The phone screen eats battery, not the app.

    I use WAZE for my daily commute, because it does so well at re-routing me around serious traffic issues. Here in the Boston area, it's a frequent occurrence..........

    LittleBill wrote:
    does waze pop up even if your not using the navigation? i just downloaded it.

    how bad of a battery killer is this?
  • LittleBill wrote:
    does waze pop up even if your not using the navigation? i just downloaded it.

    how bad of a battery killer is this?
    No, but it does run in the background with audio alerts. I often run Navigon up front and WAZE in the background.

    Drain: It uses GPS, but if it's already running with Garmin, Navigon, etc., it doesn't appear to draw anything extra since its just pulling the same NEMA data the rest of the running apps are using anyway
  • so you have to program a destination into both apps (google maps) for instance and waze at the same time?
  • LittleBill wrote:
    so you have to program a destination into both apps (google maps) for instance and waze at the same time?
    no, not unless you want to use its navagation. I use it only for road conditions and warnings, and NAVIGON as a mapper. But NAVIGON doesn't know conditions and re-routing

About RV Must Haves

Have a product you cannot live without? Share it with the community!8,793 PostsLatest Activity: Aug 22, 2023