Antenna explanation
Since the subject of HD antennas comes up here occasionally, I just couldn't resist posting this link: http://money.cnn.com/gallery/technology/innovation/2013/08/07/worst-tech-lies/5.html
Forum Discussion
MNtundraRet wrote:
Quote:
"You can both read other technical responses to see how correct I am but you choose to be obstinate. Kind of like smokers who still argue there's nothing bad in cigarettes.
FWIW, the batt-wing can indeed receive UHF but it is biased towards VHF just as the newer antenna's can receive both VLF and UHF but are biased towards UHF.
You argue that I'm "misinformed" but you can't make a technical argument for your statements.
I guess to argue is enough for some."
---
I see from your profile you are hiding in the weeds. A number of us on "Open Roads" have experience, education, in building antennas for HAM radio use and television. Some are now/were in the broadcast business. I don't see any coming to your defense.
Hiding in the weeds? Ah, I see; you can't argue with facts so you try to use some kind of insult.
Your being rather arrogant. You have no idea what my background is and FYI, I also built my own antenna's and did amateur radio for a time.
None of that matters though because it doesn't change the facts regarding the antenna's we have been discussing.
Can you hold a civil discussion?
If so please list the facts I have in error.
