strollin wrote:
Clay L wrote:
... It appears that the ability to use a mouse was an afterthought to satisfy what they thought were dinosaurs and sooner or later we would all see the light and switch over to touch screens. ...
I encounter this sentiment all over the internet. Can someone please explain it to me? What is it that they think the new interface does better via touch than what can be done with mouse/keyboard? My opinion is that using a computer via touch is much more difficult than with a mouse/keyboard and that touch is really only useful on a small screen device that doesn't have a mouse/keyboard...
OK, strollin, I'll give it a try.
IMNSHO, Microsoft developed the Metro interface with the deliberate intention of merging all their various platforms into one common interface codeset, that would give developers a "one size fits all" link to Windows Phones, tablets, PCs, Xboxes, and Smart TVs. From a developer's perspective, that's helpful; from Microsoft's perspective, that's a tremendous cost savings (only one interface development team of coders).
Also, the interface allows for "live tiles" that update their Start screen tile without requiring multiple open windows. That's especially helpful for smartphones, tablets, and Smart TVs which are always at the Start screen. It also means that you could view the latest headlines, Bing trends, and Facebook updates all from the same screen.
As for your comment that you'd rather use your mouse than a touchpad or touchscreen, that's your option. But, if you're using a Windows Phone or tablet (as many Millenials are, today), there's usually no mouse available -- the touchscreen is your only choice. Can you say iPad?
Being a "Junior Senior" (AARP < JS < Medicare), I too tend to use my mouse because I still run several W7 apps from the Desktop, but our younger generations are more comfortable with touch.