Forum Discussion
- 2gypsies1Explorer IIIDutchman Sport: LOVE your choices of campsites. We've found many looking as good as yours!
- 2gypsies1Explorer III
3oaks wrote:
It's always public campgrounds for us, national parks, state parks, C.O.E. campgrounds, country parks, national forests, etc.
We really prefer mother nature to entertain us while camping and do very well without Wi-Fi, TV, or being tethered to any other electronic media, including cell phone coverage. ;)
They may be nice to have at times, but not necessities in our book.
And full hook-ups, we don't need them. Coming from many, many years of tent camping, our TT is like a luxury cabin even without full hook-ups.
This is us exactly....traveled constantly 16 yr. of full-timing including Alaska and any of the above-mentioned public parks or boondocking near a lovely stream or lake is what we always aimed for! - IndyCampExplorerWe like to be at least somewhat in the woods without another rig on top of us, so we tend to stay at state and federal parks.
Our days are spent hiking and sitting around a fire, not watching TV or surfing the internet, so we don't care about wifi, cable, etc.
As others have said, though, it depends on what type of camper you are. There is no universal right or wrong answer. - DutchmenSportExplorerHi! Me again. I suppose the reason we don't favor private campgrounds or RV parks is because we simply enjoy the State Parks. Granted there might not be sewer hook-up at most Indiana State Parks, but that's why we have the blue tote.
For what it's worth, this is the reason why private and RV parks are just not appealing. It's pretty darn hard to beet space like this:
This is Brookville-Mounds State Recreation Area near Brookville, Indiana. We were there August 5, 6, 7.
We we just returned home from Brown County State Park (Taylor Ridge campground). Even though we had rain, rain, and more rain, you can't get THIS in too many private parks:
This is why we do State Parks! - Second_ChanceExplorer II
jarata1 wrote:
dodge guy wrote:
I have been to a couple of state parks and the site size left a lot to be desired! We have only been to a handful of private campgrounds where the sites were small.
wow I find just the opposite
It depends on what state and when and by whom the campground was designed and built. A lot of state park campgrounds were CCC (Civilian Conservation Corps) campgrounds designed and built during the Great Depression. Large RVs with slides and RV hookups hadn't even been envisioned yet.
Rob - jarata1Explorer
dodge guy wrote:
I have been to a couple of state parks and the site size left a lot to be desired! We have only been to a handful of private campgrounds where the sites were small.
wow I find just the opposite - jplante4Explorer IIThere are plenty of nice RV parks in the greater Boston area.
When I replace my crappy old RV/marine "deep cycle" batteries with some good six volt true deep cycle batteries, I'll probably do more campgrounds with no hookups. Our next Big Adventure will be out west and I'd rather hit some of the public parks. - LantleyNomadTHere is not a one size fits answer. I* take the best CG available in the area I plan to be in. I am not committed exclusively to public or private.
I am able to enjoy them both.
The OP needs to expand on their camping destinations.
All private CG's are not sardine cans and all public campgrounds do not have boundless sites.
There are both good and bad public and private CG's of all shapes and sizes ther challenge is finding the ones that meet your needs. Keep in mind needs change and everyone's needs are not the same. - CroweExplorerI took my MH to Boston area, ONCE! Never again. That area compared to the Midwest is IMHO, JMHO not RV friendly!
LOL! But it's not rocket science that an area with high population density, roads older than most of the rest of the country that were built from cow paths, and an area where 6 states combined are sometimes smaller than one state be vastly different from where wide open spaces are the norm, not the exception. This is exactly why we forewarn people about expecting to be able to drive a MH anywhere they want. It just can't happen. - bikendanExplorer
GordonThree wrote:
bighatnohorse wrote:
"Campground" is a misnomer for most private RV parks. Most are really just parking spots with hookups. For us, they are a place for overnighting or acting as a pit stop for doing laundry - in which case they're often called an RV "resort".
x2 ... for me, private parks or "resorts" don't meet with my expectation of a campground. I want trees, grass, brush, birds, trails, bugs, etc. Manicured lawns and neatly trimmed trees in an otherwise sterile gravel / paved lot is not a campground, just my humble opinion.
I could care less about water/sewer/cable hookups. I'm very transient in my camping. I don't stay put more than 3-4 days at most. If they have electric, great, if not, I'll make my own.
THIS^^^^
About RV Newbies
4,026 PostsLatest Activity: Jun 15, 2017