LaunchnRetrieve wrote:
Well, thanks for the discussion, guys. I think with my current $ situation the best use of my TT will be to find a great storage location central to a few places I would enjoy visiting again and again, making the cost of towing a minimal concern. I think I'll look into what would make a good commuter truck that can tow safely and efficiently for short distances. Either that or go back to tents, but that just doesn't seem like a lot of fun in the winter months.
An economical articulated vehicle is one that is both aerodynamic and fuel efficient as well as being longest-lived. A TV replaced every five years and TT replaced every seven is hardly a good use of money if one can find the TV/TT combination that will last well past a decade (decades, with one current TT brand).
And for those not full-timing, the cost of solo driving is more important. Most of all, the TOTAL costs of TV ownership need to be looked at (purchase, finance, insurance, maintenance, repairs, fuel, etc) as singling out one (fuel) is a little less than half the story in terms of money.
I started from a clean sheet. A non-emissions CTD plus an aero aluminum TT was easily the winner from the perspective of
longest life with highest reliability over most miles with lowest cost. In the South Central U.S. (climate and terrain matter most in fuel economy once past vehicle spec) I can hit the average of others with same basic rig: 14-16/mpg with 28'-35' TTs behind a pre-emissions DODGE CTD.
Making a few changes in solo driving habits can underwrite several thousand miles of trailer towing. Few are interested in changing old habits I've learned. But I've done it and so can others so motivated.
The TT design is more important than a specific TV when it comes to lower fuel bills . . and an aero TT can be pulled by car, minivan or other than a pickup. IOW, don't let the TT be a ball and chain. Step back and take your time.
Good luck
.