aerbus32 wrote:
Truly amazes me some of the directions a simple post can go in. Inherent in paying for an assigned site is the implication that the site is acceptable for the rig. It's one thing if you pull into a self-registration site in the middle of the forest and make a bad choice. It's different when you've made a week's reservation months ahead at a popular urban destination, clearly stating your rig size and requirements, only to get there and find your assigned site is problematic and nothing else is available. This recently almost happened to me. In talking to both the office staff and a landscaper, they seemed unaware that the trees at this relatively new park are maturing to a size that is creating problems. The grass between sites is well manicured, as are the hedges. Healthy trees require pruning. In the wild, herbivorous animals do this. With today's commercially produced trees, pruning may not be quite that simple. I'd prefer to have the site ready when I am. I have had to ask in the past and wait until they got to it. That's when I document the incident for the world to see on an RV review site, hoping to save others future frustration.
Wow, a reply that makes sense... What is this thread coming to???