Ozlander wrote:
If they gave me 40 hours work and 25 hours pay, they would get 25 hours of work and I would choose which work I thought was the most important.
Hence the problems with hourly pay that is basically unsupervised. What takes some people 20 hours can be stretched into 60 by others. We have a workamper who is a great employee who efficiently handles a variety of tasks. Two tasks he never gets are cleaning restrooms and cleaning cabins because he cannot do it in a reasonable amount of time. I can clean either in about 30 minutes. He takes hours, plural. They end up clean, but that is his top gear. He can mow an acre of grass, gather up the trash, repair a fence or change a golf cart tire as fast or faster than anyone So, we make sure his tasks do not include things he cannot do in a reasonable length of time.
Those things people are proficient at will differ with each person. I would bet a reasonably motivated, reasonably skilled person could do the assigned tasks mentioned about in 25 hours. If they don't have the motivation or the skills to get at it and get it done it might take 40 hours, but that is not the fault of the employer and they shouldn't be short changed because who they chose to hire couldn't or wouldn't work at the pace necessary to complete the tasks. The employer views it as piecework. Yes, it normally takes 25 hours, but you are being paid to complete the tasks, be it in 15 hours or 40.