hotbyte wrote:
LarryJM wrote:
...This is IMO a problem for the city to figure out how to fix and really not anything she is doing wrong to evade any actual properly assessed city service costs...
Totally disagree. She knew or should have known sewer usage is not free even if city does not have method setup to bill her without water service. She should have either a) not used the sewer service or b) worked up front with city on method to pay for service that was acceptable to both parties.
I would agree. I think this falls under the category "ignorance of the law" is no excuse.
