Forum Discussion

Community Alumni's avatar
Community Alumni
Aug 28, 2016

Factory to Dealer Transport

Unless you purchased your new RV directly from a dealer near the manufacturer, it has likely been towed or driven maybe a couple of thousand miles. My comments are mainly directed towards transport of motorhomes. A few years ago when the transmission gave out at around 22,000 miles, it was hinted by the repair shop that a possible cause was abuse. Was it initial transport or the frequent shuttling from the dealer to RV shows? Ours was already a year old when we bought it "New". I just shrugged it off as an unexplained failure. We did get a new transmission and torque converter after two failed attempts to rebuild.

Over the years we have noticed RVs on the road that were on the way to the dealer. A few times, I wondered if the new owner would have bought had they known the history. We are in the process of looking at a new motor home and having a dealer just a few miles away would be convenience. In doing research on the Net, I came across a dealer just a few miles away from the factory. While I am not convinced that there is any advantage for buying from them, they did make a point that you are getting a factory fresh RV and not something that was exposed to untold horrors in transport. A friend bought a fifth-wheel and traveled 2,000 miles to pick it up from a dealer down the block from where it was built. In his case, the cost savings was significant. That is something that would influence me as well.

All things being equal and with a sharp pencil, I would just assume buy from my local dealer as they would be doing any required service. That is until I saw something yesterday that made me think twice about buying a motor home that has been driven by ANYONE else. We spotted two new motor coaches with cars in tow that were obviously being delivered to the dealer. With a little research, I figured out where they were built and who was the dealer. I then mapped out the shortest route. The shortest route is not necessarily the best route. Here in town, we had a rash of tractor trailer trucks following a GPS route that took them under a railroad bridge that was just a bit too low. Despite the warning signs en-route, several trailers had the roofs peeled off.

Anyway, these two motor coaches that were no less than 34 feet in length were on a mountain road that was well marked with warnings with a "Last Chance" turn around. The limitation was steep grades, hairpin turns, 16 foot max pavement width two lanes, 35 foot length restrictions. Other hazards included trees and foliage low hanging and to the sides and zero clearance at pavement edge where the road was chiseled through volcanic rock. Many blind turns with oncoming traffic. My Class C Sprinter, in my opinion, the upper limit of being able to navigate with no room for error.

Okay, did they blindly trust the GPS looking for a short-cut? Were they sightseeing or were they just plain stupid? I will go with stupid, because the road was well marked and anyone with common sense would have taken another route. Google Maps says that the route they took was 12 miles shorter than the road they should have taken. A main truck route would have added only 42 miles to the 2,000+ mile trip from factory to dealer. Well, there are at least two $150,000 RVs that I know of that I would steer clear of.

39 Replies

  • if they were that delicate..
    everyone of them would need transmissions every 20,000 miles.

    automatic is automatic. I would be more concerned with engines, final drives and Brakes.

    unless they are driving at 70 with the brakes on full.
  • Any new vehicle has been driven by a dozen or more people by the time you get it. Off the factory line to a lot, to a train or truck, to a lot ,to a clean up bay, back to the lot. You get the idea.
    If you live on the other side of the mountain your new MH will have been driven over the mountain.
    If you are so worried about it, buy from the dealer closest to the factory.
  • Community Alumni's avatar
    Community Alumni
    My first motorhome had the transmission replaced under warranty with only 7,000 miles. I doubt very seriously it had anything to do with how the transport driver drove it to the dealer.
  • Walaby wrote:
    Im wondering how much abuse there really is. I mean, it's not like they are racing them around like sports cars.
    Mike


    I've seen transporters pulling trailers and yes they do drive (pull) them like race cars - way faster than I would ever pull them and way over what the cheap tires are rated for that the mfgs put on them. It doesn't surprise me buyers of new trailers have so many tires go bad. All the transporter needs to do is get the trailer there with the tires still holding air and then they're someone else's problem.

    Bill
  • Im wondering how much abuse there really is. I mean, it's not like they are racing them around like sports cars. In terms of the windy mountain road, what exactly is it there that would make you not want to buy one of them?

    Mike
  • Bumpyroad wrote:
    cmeade wrote:
    You make a great point. The only other option would be transport by rail and then you have vibration, vandalism, and the chance stray bullet holes.


    many years back I had a mobile home and inquired about moving it by rail. I was told that the inside would be a shambles from the slamming back and forth in yards, etc.
    bumpy
    Good point, those rail cars can receive some serious abuse. We used to get rail cars loaded with 20,000 lb. steel coils, that had torn loose the 2 inch wide steel strapping that secured them, and slid from one end of the car to the other.
  • I managed to make it through to the end, although lack of paragraphs made it a bit tiresome.

    I am a bit confused about your discussion of a mountainous route with all the assorted dangers. Did you see the motorhomes on that route or are you speculating that they came that way? And why would you steer clear of those particular motorhomes if they did come that way? If there's no damage what would be the issue?
  • cmeade wrote:
    You make a great point. The only other option would be transport by rail and then you have vibration, vandalism, and the chance stray bullet holes.


    many years back I had a mobile home and inquired about moving it by rail. I was told that the inside would be a shambles from the slamming back and forth in yards, etc.
    bumpy
  • You make a great point. The only other option would be transport by rail and then you have vibration, vandalism, and the chance stray bullet holes.

About RV Tips & Tricks

Looking for advice before your next adventure? Look no further.25,178 PostsLatest Activity: Nov 28, 2025