Forum Discussion
68 Replies
- Cloud_DancerExplorer IINo need to waste a bullet on the messenger, let's march on MIT......:B
- TerryallanExplorer II
shelbyfv wrote:
You guys should maybe post your educational credentials to give your ideas some credibility. There are folks who understand these things. I don't and I doubt there are many here who do. You get cancer, you go to a doctor. You want to file a lawsuit you get a lawyer. You want your kids to have an education, at some point you have to send them to school. And yes, the site is one sided, that's what is meant by consensus.
In truth, more and more in the scientific world are admitting that man has nothing to do with Climate change or what ever the crooks are calling it this week.
Why do I use "scientists". Those are just after the money. They will say anything to keep the cash flowing. Already been proven.
And NO I don't trust the ones begging for money. - shelbyfvExplorerMight be something to be said for having beachfront property here in TN!
- FLY_4_FUNExplorerMy opinion is global warming cant come fast enough for me. I would love to not have to winterize my rv....lol
I realize its a serious discussion...but I do my part for the environment and just enjoy my life and like politics I don't get excited about it at all.
Daryll - shelbyfvExplorerAbsolutely. And there is plenty of room for differing opinions about what if anything to do. That's where politics comes in. The science is what it is, though.
- westendExplorerOne thing for sure, the debate on climate change is divisive.
Users of this Forum tend to be older and more conservative so there is a large push back on anything related to environmental issues. Additive to that is the huge propaganda machine of the fossil fuel industry and the lobbying efforts that have made our lawmakers tell us that it isn't a reality.
If we all could at least reach a consensus that the climate is changing at an abrupt rate, that would be a good first step in understanding the mechanisms at work.
Oh,BTW, three years of college level chemistry and biological science. - shelbyfvExplorerYou guys should maybe post your educational credentials to give your ideas some credibility. There are folks who understand these things. I don't and I doubt there are many here who do. You get cancer, you go to a doctor. You want to file a lawsuit you get a lawyer. You want your kids to have an education, at some point you have to send them to school. And yes, the site is one sided, that's what is meant by consensus.
- timmacExplorer
shelbyfv wrote:
I'm sorry but you are simply wrong. Here is a link if you want to learn https://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus-intermediate.htm The fact that you put "scientists" in quotes makes me wonder whom you trust for information.
That's about a one sided site, I guess it gets its funding from the same place the crooked climate scientist got funded.
Climate has changed many times in the past long before power plants, SUV's, RV's and air conditioners so for anyone to tell me its us humans and expect funding at the same can go jump off a _____..
CNN is Fake News. - shelbyfvExplorer
Terryallan wrote:
I'm sorry but you are simply wrong. Here is a link if you want to learn https://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-scientific-consensus-intermediate.htm The fact that you put "scientists" in quotes makes me wonder whom you trust for information.Chris Bryant wrote:
The difference is the climate is changing *much* faster now than in history, other than the mass extinction events, which is what we are doing now to ourselves.
In truth there is no proof that man is to blame. The climate "scientists" have first been caught, and then admitted to faking the data to keep the money rolling in.
And let us not forget that these same Scientists told Nixion that Manhattan Island would be 3 feet under water by the year 2001. Well.... it's NOT, and pretty much ALL the predictions made by the "scientists" have been proven false.
is the world changing. yes it is. Are we to blame? Prolly not, unless you count the clear cutting of forest land for Solar farms, and windmills that kill birds - timmacExplorer
Chris Bryant wrote:
timmac wrote:
Chris Bryant wrote:
The difference is the climate is changing *much* faster now than in history, other than the mass extinction events, which is what we are doing now to ourselves.
Wrong...
Did you ever read about those mammoths that were frozen in a matter of seconds found with undigested food in their stomachs.
Now that was fast climate change..
Umm- that's called a mass extinction event, like I pointed out.
Well than point out some facts that the climate is changing much faster today than in the past ??
Because climate changes and its never the same, sometimes fast sometimes slow but it does change..
About RV Tips & Tricks
Looking for advice before your next adventure? Look no further.25,178 PostsLatest Activity: Nov 14, 2025