tragusa3 wrote:
We did 3 days of 600 miles last year to get out and the same coming home. Doing it that way gave us all the advantages of more time in the places we wanted to be, but it also gave a unique sense of distance.
I think it's that "all the advantages of more time in the places we wanted to be" that counts. If you want your trip to be about seeing the sites along the way, then 600 miles per day doesn't make much sense (no time left to sightsee). But if you are just trying to get to a destination, then why waste time in places where you don't want to be and lose time at the place where you do want to be.
