Interesting vehicle

valhalla360 wrote:

Chum lee wrote:

valhalla360 wrote:

dodge guy wrote:
Unless they modified the suspension, that thing will shake that TT to death, not to mention the people in the Cab! I like the idea though.

Have you ever been in a trailer on a rough road...they shake a lot anyway.

No, I haven't. (my Class A is bad enough) Why? In every state I've traveled, IMO, it's illegal/unsafe for humans to ride in a trailer. . . in motion, on the highway. Regardless, . . . IMO, it's not a bad idea, but, in this case, it's an economical prototype, not a successful production model. If it works for you, . . . hey, . . . why not? IMO, it has all the benefits of a travel trailer, but, FEW of the benefits of a Class A-B-C motor home. (no connection between the cab, chassis, and, the coach)

Chum lee

Never suggested it was a good idea to ride in a trailer. It is actually legal in some states with certain requirements but that's not the point of this thread so I suggest starting a different one if you want to discuss the issue.

I don't think anyone was suggesting it was a production model or comparable to a Class A-B-C...that's not the point. Look up Overlanders, totally different expectations and this fits in with that pretty darn well but without some of the crazy prices.

Please stop telling me what the point "isn't" in this thread, as if I don't know what it. . . . "is." (clearly, you think you do and I don't) Previously, I have agreed that the OP's referenced design is a good/economical idea as long as it meets the potential user needs. (I have no idea what they are) The vehicle referenced does not fit most accepted standard production norms. (Class A, B, C, TT, camper, popup, 5th Wheel, etc.) My suggestion to the OP is that they, "consider that" prior to their purchase, rather than to divert the thread.

Nice try. You need not reply.

Chum lee