MetalGator wrote:
dubdub07 wrote:
I can assure you that if it rides rough then everything is right in the world. If there is a Wrangler out there that doesn't have a rough ride then something is terribly wrong.....
I guess "rides rough" is subjective as I don't think my wife's 2014 JKU rides rough. It's no Cadillac but it's not rough. Now, my 2015 JK is rough if you aren't on a smooth road but it's got an awfully short wheelbase. We take my wife's JKU on road trips all the time and it is a comfortable ride. But I'm not used to riding in luxury cars as I don't like riding on the ground.
You are absolutely correct, the ride IS subjective. Not ALL Jeep Wranglers ride rough. There's only a few zillion variables that dictate just how they ride. Of course they're different than many autos/trucks/SUVs/ and other makes and models, IT'S A JEEP FOR CHRISTS SAKE!!!! But, in the light of the fact that Jeep has done quite a bit in refinements in the last few years, and, after owning 9 different Jeep Wranglers over the last 35 years, I'd say the newer ones, as in JKs and JLs, ride CONSIDERABLY better than the CJs, YJs, and TJs.
Besides, if one were to do just a tad bit of research, you'd find there are tags with numbers on each set of front and rear springs for the JKs and JLs. Those numbers represent different springs for different applications. As in Sport, X, Sahara, Rubicon, Recon, Hard Rock and all that. Each of those will have different spring rates and will have different spring numbers.
When one purchases a Jeep Wrangler, one basically expects for it to ride somewhat different than the Cadillac they drove to the Jeep dealership. It's a given. But, if one were to test drive say, a Rubicon or a Hard Rock edition, then jump right into a Sahara, I guarantee you'll feel a difference in the ride. Not to mention, there's considerable differences in the tires that are supplied with the various models.
Scott