Most RV friendly Cities and States

fulltimedaniel wrote:
Qouted from a well known poster:

"And, like it or not, there is only so much any city can do to roll out the welcome wagon and not step on local businesses. They could offer free RV sites with full hookups, but that sure would put a dent in the business of the local RV parks. How would the local restaurants feel if that same town offered free breakfasts and dinners for tourists at their community centers? Would the local auto repair facilities welcome the county maintenance garage fixing tourists cars for free? Giving away one business'service to increase the business at another is robbing Peter to pay Paul at best. Who has the right to make the determination that a souvenir shop is more important than a RV Park?"

The problem with this reasoning is this: Wal Mart is A. Not the city B. They offer no hookups or amenities.

Thus to compare what WalMart or Cabelas does by allowing people to Park their RV's in their lots IS NOT on the same plane as the City Offering free breakfasts, car repair or RV hookups thereby competing DIRECTLY with Denny's et al.

In fact many cities and counties all over the country do have their own RV Parks and some are the nicest I have stayed in. This is for a fee, often very reasonable and THAT is the REAL competition to the RV Parks...Not WalMart.

As we have come to expect from your posts, you are once again way off topic and completely obfuscating the point. The tread is about friendly CITIES and STATES, not Walmart or Cabelas. I couldn't care less about what a Walmart or a Cabelas does with overnight parking in their lots. That is between them, the landowner and the local authorities. However, when a municipality chooses to compete directly with a local business, and I don't care the rationale they use, that is wrong. The comparison to opening a free RV park to compete with the local private parks is exactly the same as offering free food at their community center or free auto service at their maintenance facilities and thus competing with the local restaurants and auto repair companies.
The rationale often stated by these municipalities is with the money visitors save not paying for an RV site allows them to spend more money at the other businesses in town. That is the definition of a government choosing what businesses should thrive and which ones should fail. That might be good politics in Cambodia, but not in the US.

Qouted from a well known poster:

"And, like it or not, there is only so much any city can do to roll out the welcome wagon and not step on local businesses. They could offer free RV sites with full hookups, but that sure would put a dent in the business of the local RV parks. How would the local restaurants feel if that same town offered free breakfasts and dinners for tourists at their community centers? Would the local auto repair facilities welcome the county maintenance garage fixing tourists cars for free? Giving away one business'service to increase the business at another is robbing Peter to pay Paul at best. Who has the right to make the determination that a souvenir shop is more important than a RV Park?"

The problem with this reasoning is this: Wal Mart is A. Not the city B. They offer no hookups or amenities.

Thus to compare what WalMart or Cabelas does by allowing people to Park their RV's in their lots IS NOT on the same plane as the City Offering free breakfasts, car repair or RV hookups thereby competing DIRECTLY with Denny's et al.

In fact many cities and counties all over the country do have their own RV Parks and some are the nicest I have stayed in. This is for a fee, often very reasonable and THAT is the REAL competition to the RV Parks...Not WalMart.

Your welcome, I'm more than happy to do that for you.

I want to thank all of you folks that dislike CA and won't come here with your RV...you all will help free up some of the RV spots that we enjoy the most. :)

AJBert wrote:

D.E.Bishop wrote:

jplante4 wrote:
Boy I hate seeing New England being bunched in with Kalifornia. Gordon, I wonder if you've been to either.

It is spelled with a "C"!

The problem for me, and evidently many others, is the people who vote in the state for other people who have ruined the state and have been spreading their poison to neighboring states.
And don't get me going about the "celebs" from Hollyweird!

Edited because I decided not to take the bait. Posts like this are poison to RV.net. Time to close this useless and very political bashing thread.

jplante4 wrote:

Jbrowland wrote:
Here we go again with the California bashing. Please come and we Californians will GLADLY show you more National Parks than any other state in this glorious country. Not to mention, hundreds of miles of rugged coast that would make your draw drop. Sure, it comes with a price but I think it's worth it and so do millions of visitors every year from around the world.

And I just read a rather long post about how no one in their right mind even bothers to try to camp in California in the summer due to overcrowding. SO what good does it do to have all these wonderful resources if you don't get to use them?

I'm leaving tomorrow morning for a two week RV trip. We are booked in Point Reyes National Seashore (close to San Fran, Muir Woods Golden Gate NRA, Alcatraz, and more) and then heading south through parts of Big Sur right on the water (had to change plans a little due to the bridge collapse in Bug Sur) and then to Monterey, Santa Cruz, Pinnacles National Park, Morro Bay along the PCH. All of the places we are staying are state and national park campgrounds and I have done almost the same type of tip in the summer.

It's possible but it takes some planning and it is worth it. :)

jmtandem wrote:

I think California sux for being RV friendly with that lousy 55 MPH speed limit for anybody towing something.

If the 55 mph towing speed limit is the worst thing you can think of about taking an RV into California then it must be a pretty great state and you can't find much to complain about.

RV'ing wise, Cali isn't that bad. As far as it being a 'pretty great state' it once was but that was decades ago when I lived there (born and raised in the OC). Now, Moonbeam and the rest of the socialist's are destroying Kali. The Kali voters have put some real wack-jobs in office. The state is broke. Kali was recently considering seceding from the Union. I could go on.

D.E.Bishop wrote:

jplante4 wrote:
Boy I hate seeing New England being bunched in with Kalifornia. Gordon, I wonder if you've been to either.

It is spelled with a "C"!

Now that's funny right there, I don't care who you are!

Personally, I will never go back to Kalifornia. I spent three different tours there, two in San Diego and one in the Bay Area from the late 80s into the early 00s (not consecutive). I do agree that the state is by far the most diverse when it comes to geography and is really a very beautiful state. No argument there in the least.

I also understand that it is basically three different states, though some only claim two.

The problem for me, and evidently many others, is the people who vote in the state for other people who have ruined the state and have been spreading their poison to neighboring states. Heck, the front range of CO is basically baby CA from Castle Rock up to Fort Collins! Look at WA and OR! And try to find a native CA that lives in San Diego.

But, it really is a state of true natural treasures. Took me a while to lift my jaw back into its normal position after seeing Big Trees National Monument for the first time. Just sad, IMHO, that the people of the state have ruined it so much that others don't even want to visit for the first time.

And don't get me going about the "celebs" from Hollyweird!

fulltimedaniel wrote:

wing_zealot wrote:
I would have to be bound, chained in the trunk vehicle, gagged, and drugged before you would get me to CA.

Why? California has some of the most dramatic scenery ANYWHERE in the world, Yosemite, Sequoia Natl Parks and Death Valley. The California coast drive along Hwy 1. and up through the Redwoods which don;t exist anywhere else in this country.

Most of California's freeways and roads are in decent shape. There are notable exceptions for sure.

The worlds biggest and oldest trees are in California. And so is the world renown Monterrey Bay Aquarium.

California is also very RV friendly in my experience. Most restaurants, fast food places and other businesses have large parking lots that accommodate us. Grocery prices are very reasonable and fruits and vegetables are cheap by most standards and great.

California has a lot to offer especially the RV'er. In fact it may have the highest concentration of RV ownership of any state. Everyone seems to have one of some sort.

I've read some of your posts, thanks but I won't be needing any of your recommendations.

jplante4 wrote:
Boy I hate seeing New England being bunched in with Kalifornia. Gordon, I wonder if you've been to either.

It is spelled with a "C"!