rexmitchell wrote:
jkwilson wrote:
Insuring something you can afford to replace is a poor financial decision. If you can’t afford to replace a portable generator, you shouldn’t have one because they are difficult to insure. Insure companies sell the idea that insurance is a good idea. It’s a bad gamble in almost all cases until it begins covering more than you can afford to pay.
Seems like pretty dumb logic. I can replace my pickup but cover it with insurance because I’d prefer not to write a check when a couple hundred bucks a year covers me in the event of a total loss. Risk mitigation is smart if it is cost effective. Just like we ensure personal items that are valuable, I wanted to explore the same with a generator that costs over 2k. The price isn’t right/not available so I’m not doing it but it was worth exploring.....
Could have explained it better but he's right....
On average, insuring something will long term be more expensive than simply paying for the replacement. With insurance, the price has to pay the average replacement cost plus advertising, agents, taxes, all kinds of expenses of running a business and making a profit.
Where insurance makes sense is for rare events that would cause a major financial impact.
- Lose a $1k generator...I'd be mad but I could go out and buy another without any significant long term effect on my financial situation.
- Lose a brand new $70k pickup a week after buying it...While I would get by, it would be a significant impact that could set me back a few years going towards retirement, to liberate enough cash to go get another...I would want to protect against that.
- Lose an old $5k pickup...again, I would be mad but it's not a big impact on my lifestyle.
- $250k house...very few people can justify skipping the insurance as the impact of a loss is simply too high.