Forum Discussion
gotsmart
Jun 05, 2012Explorer
lanerd wrote:
You know, it seems more people here are more interested in the "legality" of having supplemental braking system.
Having a supplemental braking system installed on my rig was done with "safety" in mind way before I even thought of the legal aspect.
It stands to reason that during an emergency situation, a mh with a toad will stop quicker and in a shorter distance with a supplemental braking system than without.
It may only be a few feet, but that few feet may save a life, maybe even mine. To me, the choice is obvious. I don't understand why it's not to others.
Ron
I agree with you. I was correcting Rich by pointing out that California does not treat towed vehicles the same way as it does with trailers. I didn't want to muddy the conversation by adding "it's a really good idea to have supp. brakes on your toad" to the legal argument.
About RV Tips & Tricks
Looking for advice before your next adventure? Look no further.25,114 PostsLatest Activity: Feb 22, 2025