Forum Discussion
thomas_malenich
Sep 03, 2004Explorer
Tim,
On page 5 after much discussion Ron proposed these two statements:
So, please consider the following two statements:
1) The WD system distributes tongue weight over both the front and rear axle (that is the purpose of it), and
2) The WD system removes load from the TV's rear axle and distributes it to the TV's front axle and to the TT's axles.
I chose #2, Barney chose #2, 20Home Depot chose #2, Ron chose #2, and David chose #2. From there the definition evolved. Recently I have been suggesting that we consider ADDING something like this to our agreed definition :" A weight distribution system also increases the capacity of the receiver." This feature is important.
What do we need to do to convince you that #1 is not as accurate and/or can be more subject to misinterpretation?? Since my arguments are not working, perhaps someone else can chime in here.
On page 5 after much discussion Ron proposed these two statements:
So, please consider the following two statements:
1) The WD system distributes tongue weight over both the front and rear axle (that is the purpose of it), and
2) The WD system removes load from the TV's rear axle and distributes it to the TV's front axle and to the TT's axles.
Which of these do you think is the better definition (meaning less subject to misinterpretation) of the purpose of a WD hitch?
I chose #2, Barney chose #2, 20Home Depot chose #2, Ron chose #2, and David chose #2. From there the definition evolved. Recently I have been suggesting that we consider ADDING something like this to our agreed definition :" A weight distribution system also increases the capacity of the receiver." This feature is important.
What do we need to do to convince you that #1 is not as accurate and/or can be more subject to misinterpretation?? Since my arguments are not working, perhaps someone else can chime in here.
About RV Tips & Tricks
Looking for advice before your next adventure? Look no further.25,104 PostsLatest Activity: Jan 22, 2025