Thanks for the list of definitions Thomas. But as you indicated, it doesn’t really clear things up does it?
If I had to choose one of the given definitions from Ron with my knowledge gained by this thread I would defiantly have to go with #2.
1) The WD system distributes tongue weight over both the front and rear axle (that is the purpose of it), and
No indication that changing the TT’s COG would/could put more weight on the TT’s axel or axels.
2) The WD system removes load from the TV's rear axle and distributes it to the TV's front axle and to the TT's axles.
Hitch weight is what is truly distributed and taking weight off of the TV’s rear axel is what the desired effect of the design is.
Is this the jist of it or do I need to go back and reread the thread? I have been busier than a centipede with athlete’s foot at work and have not read this post with the diligence I would like to have. It took me several days to catch up with you all (if I have).
