TomG2 wrote:
valhalla360 wrote:
The flaw in this logic is most RV's die of old age not system failures.
Thanks for making my point for me. When we purchase toys like campers, we are buying years of service. Which one has the most life left to give, a brand new unit or one that is already four years old?
Would you buy a unit with 20yrs of service left for $500k or one with 15yrs of service for $20k.
If as you indicate, you buy based solely on years of service, you would buy the $500k unit but most logical people would choose the second option.
Now I've exaggerated the numbers to demonstrate the principal but it holds true for typical new vs used choice.
I buy for "Cost per Year of Service".