Supposedly Millenicom uses the Verizon cellular system, so I guess Millenicom wants us to assume that everywhere you can get Verizon cell tower access you can get Millenicom access.
I wonder how literally true that is? Will a company contracting to ride piggyback on another company's cellular infrastructure ACTUALLY be allowed to have as good cellular coverage as the company owning the infrastructure? That doesn't seem like good contract writing to me.
If true, I'd really consider Millenicom because I love the Verizon system coverage using our Wilson cellular amplifier and Wilson rooftop cellular antenna when camping out in the middle of nowhere. What I don't like is Verizon's 5 gigabytes per month cap - or even their 10 or 20 gigabytes per month data caps. In fact, if Verizon had a 4G plan with, say, a 50 gigabytes per month cap or better yet unlimited data - I'd use them full time even here at home through my motorhome's hotspot (we store the motorhome in the backyard always hooked up anyway).
My current home Internet access is broadband, unlimited data, and is only $40 per month. American Internet providers need to wise up and start offering the prices, data speeds, and data caps (if any) that Europe enjoys. We watch a lot of Netflix content via our home's Internet and even a lot of data rich videos from the news networks over the Internet, so high data caps or none at all is the name of the game for us at home. I'd like close to the same in the RV.