400 mile electric RV

rlw999 wrote:

3 tons wrote:
At best, a Forbes Opinion writer (or any other cherry picked ‘green theologian’) merely offers his anecdotal account repeat with bias (opinion is bias) in no way a substitute for objective empirical independent study…Before adopting such policies, where’s the independent peer reviewed study??

Don't pretend you'd accept peer reviewed research when you'll just dismiss it with "Be advised that Universities routinely compete for Gov’t Grant moola ($$ cash cow) by willingly contracting to substantiate what’s often and essential a politically preordained outcome"

Where's your peer reviewed research backing your claims?

Ha, there’s no need to impute my feelings (a ‘don’t like the message, discredit the messenger’ thingy), when I’ve merely brought to your attention the lacking of such peer reviewed study…One might think that BEFORE arriving at ANY particular public policy, it quite naturally would be preceded by a cogent objective study (something beyond a magazine story), where the various scientific opinions could be aired, thus one would think that it too would be in your camp’s interest to advocate for such to help bolster your particular point of view…What ever happened to “Follow the science”??

3 tons