Forum Discussion
3_tons
Oct 07, 2021Explorer III
It’s reassuring to see this debate taking place, but for the energy infrastructure to be able to meet all of our energy needs with absolute accident free perfection is just patently unrealistic…No one savors accidents, and accident avoidance is forever an on-going science - yet our personal energy ‘demands’ (lifestyles of ‘choice’) are mostly an ignored culpable element of the accident matrix…Bottom line is that we all have skin in the game, but the decisions (and subsequent policies…) we make are only as good as the information we receive - poor science (and a near lack of citizen oversight) leads to poor decision making, and near impossibility of arriving at a sentient practical consensus…This is why I’ve stated “show us the objective (non- politicized) science” - we (and our progeny) deserve full disclosure to a non-partisanized point of view - a net carbon analysis would be an obvious place to start…Otherwise, all Good Points :)
3 tons
3 tons
About Technical Issues
Having RV issues? Connect with others who have been in your shoes.24,211 PostsLatest Activity: Mar 11, 2025