Forum Discussion
MEXICOWANDERER
Aug 26, 2013Explorer
SeƱor Gale, IMHO you are correct.
It takes a curious set of circumstances to spurious sulfate a positive battery plate when 5% A/H discharges are involved. BTW many old news telephone UPS systems used a shallow cycle battery maintenance recharge protocol. Lockheed Skunk Works managed to do the same thing with their gigantic bank of 8-D batteries. All PhD engineers and not a one had a clue. I installed a constant float voltage system, a 100-ampere charger for top charging, a six-hour spring wound timer and a single syllable set of instructions. Three years later and no complaints. The reason the timer was variable was because I did not trust them to not come up with the bright idea of adding more battery capacity.
It takes a curious set of circumstances to spurious sulfate a positive battery plate when 5% A/H discharges are involved. BTW many old news telephone UPS systems used a shallow cycle battery maintenance recharge protocol. Lockheed Skunk Works managed to do the same thing with their gigantic bank of 8-D batteries. All PhD engineers and not a one had a clue. I installed a constant float voltage system, a 100-ampere charger for top charging, a six-hour spring wound timer and a single syllable set of instructions. Three years later and no complaints. The reason the timer was variable was because I did not trust them to not come up with the bright idea of adding more battery capacity.
About Technical Issues
Having RV issues? Connect with others who have been in your shoes.24,336 PostsLatest Activity: Nov 16, 2025