Battle Born Charging
This might answer some recent questions. The table is not accurate wrt to the BB comments--don't go by it by the table itself. Wade through the questions and answers to get the true picture. Tak...
Forum Discussion
Good info on the Trimetric. 2% for heat loss compares with BB claim of 99% efficient battery, but Tri explains the diff between charging efficiency and battery efficiency, if that applies here.
2% amps for full is different from 4-5% Li links say is full
It looks like Mobilesport's monitor has no setting for heat loss while recharging so it will overstate the AH going to "full"
-----------------------
That 10 minutes from 2:00 -2:10 is worth 9AH at 53 amps, so now all the distortion was in the first hour and total overage was 25AH (53-28)
Of that 28% SOC, by 40 min it was up to 10% then it did 18 more in the next 20 minutes. After that, the rise in SOC over time matches the rise in AH at 53 amps. The voltage does not match, being fairly flat until near the end, which is correct.
If the monitor was just late getting started counting AH and %SOC that would explain it, but it was counting %SOC from the start.
The heat loss (in amps) from the bad connection did not get to the battery, but the monitor did not see that via its shunt or else the amps shown would not be constant 53 in the first hour.
The heat loss might show in the battery voltage not rising as fast as normal in the first hour, don't know what is normal.
It is a mystery why the monitor's %SOC rose to 28% while at the same time its AH counter must have been near 53AH
I have to edit some previous posts where I missed that 10 minutes time out.
2% amps for full is different from 4-5% Li links say is full
It looks like Mobilesport's monitor has no setting for heat loss while recharging so it will overstate the AH going to "full"
-----------------------
That 10 minutes from 2:00 -2:10 is worth 9AH at 53 amps, so now all the distortion was in the first hour and total overage was 25AH (53-28)
Of that 28% SOC, by 40 min it was up to 10% then it did 18 more in the next 20 minutes. After that, the rise in SOC over time matches the rise in AH at 53 amps. The voltage does not match, being fairly flat until near the end, which is correct.
If the monitor was just late getting started counting AH and %SOC that would explain it, but it was counting %SOC from the start.
The heat loss (in amps) from the bad connection did not get to the battery, but the monitor did not see that via its shunt or else the amps shown would not be constant 53 in the first hour.
The heat loss might show in the battery voltage not rising as fast as normal in the first hour, don't know what is normal.
It is a mystery why the monitor's %SOC rose to 28% while at the same time its AH counter must have been near 53AH
I have to edit some previous posts where I missed that 10 minutes time out.
