Forum Discussion
MEXICOWANDERER
May 26, 2015Explorer
When time is money with a running generator crunching numbers soon brings up the combined cost/time factor of using a genset. Pistons, recon rods, liners and a new overhead will set me back around 4K. Throw in a camshaft, followers, injector pump, gaskets and bearings plus turning the crankshaft and it adds up to real money. The Kubota running at 70% load does not eat that much more fuel than it does at 40%. Fuel is $3.55/gal US But it's the seventy-mile round trip that's a killer just for fuel.
So I whack perhaps 15% off the cycle life total by full absorbsion limit charging but reduce charhing time by 35%. I have must have spent 100-hours crunching numbers and no way can "ideal" charge levels compete. In my scenario it would be a joke.
Factoring generator size, manageabiliy, cost, then paying for large chargers enters the picture. I have fun crunching numbers - others get migranes.
Then there is intangibles - do I want to listen to a generator rattling all day?
But utilizing 10% of a 3 000 watt generator to pray to the "ideal" C gods is silly and expensive. Battery companies wish to make their product look as good as possible. Hang the expenses.
So I whack perhaps 15% off the cycle life total by full absorbsion limit charging but reduce charhing time by 35%. I have must have spent 100-hours crunching numbers and no way can "ideal" charge levels compete. In my scenario it would be a joke.
Factoring generator size, manageabiliy, cost, then paying for large chargers enters the picture. I have fun crunching numbers - others get migranes.
Then there is intangibles - do I want to listen to a generator rattling all day?
But utilizing 10% of a 3 000 watt generator to pray to the "ideal" C gods is silly and expensive. Battery companies wish to make their product look as good as possible. Hang the expenses.
About Technical Issues
Having RV issues? Connect with others who have been in your shoes.24,241 PostsLatest Activity: May 07, 2025